Skip to content
PERMISSION/PROTOCOL

Evidence for review

AI agent compliance evidence for authorization and audit reviews.

An authorization record can help answer who approved an action and what they approved. Your organization still needs to define the control, demonstrate that it works, and show that it covers the relevant workflow.

Practical evidence checklist

What to log for an AI-agent action

These fields can support NIST, ISO 42001, SOC 2, EU AI Act, and customer security reviews when they are relevant to your system and control scope. They do not replace the control itself.

Actor and authority
Identify the agent, the human or service operating it, and the authority the actor had when the action was requested.
Action and target
Record the exact operation, destination, environment, and data or system the action could affect.
Policy and decision inputs
Preserve the policy version, risk classification, constraints, and evidence presented to the reviewer or policy engine.
Exact artifact
Bind the decision to the commit, payload, tool call, or other artifact with a stable identifier or cryptographic hash.
Approval decision
Record who approved, denied, or escalated the action, when the decision occurred, and when that authority expires.
Execution outcome
Link the authorization record to what actually executed so reviewers can compare the approved action with the observed result.

Framework mapping is not certification.

These guides describe potential supporting evidence. They do not certify Permission Protocol or your organization, establish full conformance, or guarantee acceptance by an auditor or regulator.

Start with a concrete evidence request.

Bring one workflow, the requirement your reviewer wants to test, and the evidence you already have. We can scope an evaluation around the missing piece.

Discuss your evidence requirement